“Militias are becoming more audacious in attacking US personnel in Iraq, with rocket strikes against military bases occurring more frequently and, for the first time, in broad daylight,” The Washington Post reported Saturday quoting American officials that spoke on the condition of anonymity, alleging -- without any evidence -- that the attacks have been perpetrated by “Iran-backed” groups.

The report then points out that the question of how to deter future attacks against US targets in the war-torn country without putting troops at greater risk “highlights how much American security and influence have evaporated in Iraq.”

According to the daily, in the two weeks since US forces conducted bombing raids against Iraqi army’s Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) just outside the nation’s capital of Baghdad to avenge a rocket attack on the US-occupied Taji military base that killed a Briton and two Americans, “the Trump administration has been wrestling with what additional steps to take to confront the militias without sparking costly retaliation.”

The report then goes on to underline Washington’s inability to make Iraqi authorities to track down and prosecute those responsible for the rocket attacks against US facilities in the country, pointing out that American air raids on PMU forces were instead censured by the Iraqi army as “treacherous” as militia groups opposing US military presence in Iraq vowed further attacks on American installations in their nation.

An Iraqi lawmaker says the US has fortified security in and around its embassy in Baghdad amid reported plans to target Hashd al-Sha’abi.

Since the US strikes, there have been at least four more rocket attacks around American military and diplomatic compounds as officials in Washington express concerns that it is only a matter of time before more US troops are killed or wounded.

Moreover, the daily further points to what one military official described as “a lot of chatter about” further militia attacks that indicates the Trump administration is struggling to calibrate its potential response.

It then lists potential US strike targets as bases of Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps inside Iran and in Syria, noting however that such targets “were swiftly dismissed as likely to prompt greater escalation,” citing two individuals familiar with the decision-making in Washington that spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Yet another US consideration may be the level of confidence it has in identifying who is behind a particular attack, according to the daily, which emphasized that after the rocket attack on Camp Taji Britain refused to join the American retaliatory bombing raids “because it did not believe the evidence provided by the Americans met the legal threshold to justify a strike” against Iraq’s PMU forces.

Reporter’s code: 50101